UK Parliament - Combatting Doping in Sport

Combatting Doping in Sport / Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee (DCMS). - London : UK Parliament, 2018. - DCMS Fourth Report of Session 2017-19)


Summary

There is overwhelming evidence of the widespread use of performance enhancing drugs in sport. Some are illegal in any respect; others are legal, but are used in suspicious ways. Whether permitted for selective use or banned outright, performance enhancing drugs can have serious consequences for the integrity of sport and the wellbeing of individual athletes. The huge increase in financial rewards for successful sports men and women carries the increased risk of incentives to use drugs to cheat.

Our long inquiry has relied on detailed oral and written evidence, academic research, investigative journalism, and whistleblowers, to uncover this covert and pervasive activity across different sports. The inquiry studied both agencies responsible for policing the use of performance enhancing drugs, and the programmes that, as our report will demonstrate, have used them in questionable ways.

In particular, our inquiry has found acute failures in several different organisations in athletics and cycling: a failure to share appropriate medical records with anti-doping organisations; a failure to keep proper internal records of the medical substances given to athletes; and a failure to outlaw the use of potentially dangerous drugs in certain sports. All of these failures have occurred in an under-resourced national anti-doping infrastructure, which has had neither the financial means nor powers of enforcement. Some steps have been taken to alleviate this context and the failures it has permitted, but these measures have come too late. We call on those bodies identified in this report to pay serious attention to our recommendations; we cannot afford to allow these same failures to happen again.


Contents

1.) Knowledge and prevalence of doping in world athletics
- Investigations by The Sunday Times and German Broadcaster ARD
- The IAAF database
- Response of athletics authorities to the allegations
- WADA’s investigations into Russia
- Lord Coe’s evidence to the Committee
- Subsequent evidence regarding corruption at the IAAF
- Reaction of the IAAF to the IC Report
- The University of Tübingen Study
2.) British Cycling and Team Sky
- Therapeutic Use Exemptions (TUEs)
- The 2011 Criterium du Dauphiné cycling road race
- Medicines policy at Team Sky
3.) UK athletics
- The Nike Oregon Project (NOP)
- L-carnitine
- UKAD
- Underfunding of UKAD
4.) Criminalisation of doping in sports

Original document

Parameters

Date
5 March 2018
People
Collings, Damian
Original Source
Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (UK Parliament)
Country
United Kingdom
Language
English
Legal Terms
Anti-Doping policy
Circumstantial evidence
Corruption
Criminal case / judicial inquiry
Digital evidence / information
Sport/IFs
Athletics (WA) - World Athletics
Cycling (UCI) - International Cycling Union
Other organisations
British Cycling Federation (BCF)
Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee (DCMS)
Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (UK Parliament)
Team Sky
UK Anti-Doping (UKAD)
UK Athletics
World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)
Medical terms
Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE)
Various
ADAMS
Athlete Biological Passport (ABP)
Doping culture
McLaren reports
Prevalence
Publicity / public disclosure
Document category
Report
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
5 March 2018
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin